Strengths and Weaknesses of Napoleon as a Military Leader (research Essay

Strengths and Weaknesses of Napoleon as a Military Leader (research paper) - Essay Example There is a volume of academic material on his military legacies that are studied as examples in military colleges (Abbott 23). The simple argument of Napoleon Bonaparte swirls feelings. He was indeed one of the ‘greatest army minds’ in the record of combat. The activities of his life have motivated the creativeness of researchers, fictional numbers, instructing authorities, filmmakers and learners as well. Both the limitless compliment and highly effective criticisms placed on such a famous determine have provided considerably to the development of the Napoleonic legend. The available historical material touching on the life of Napoleon Bonaparte reveals lack of consensus among historians concerning his qualities as a military leaver. While others commend him for his extraordinary skills as an organizer and a charismatic leader, on the other hand, others have argued that he was not a schemer and strategic thinker. This line of argument has it that Napoleon was over-dependent on the strategies of his predecessors, and only managed to improvise military strategies rather than effectively plan war schemes (Antonmarchi 34). Those who hold this line of thought further suggest that his eventual downfall can be directly attributed to his weakness, although those who disagree argue that it is his characteristics that propelled him to dominating much of Europe. This paper seeks to assess the strengths and characteristics of Napoleon Bonaparte that made him a successful military leader. The paper also draws on his weakness and failures, in order to come up with a balanced analysis of his military legacy. In doing the analysis, evidence from some of his expeditions will be used together with empirical evidence from scholarly materials. Armed with an unending ambition and cunningness, Napoleon came into power in 1799 through a military coup d’Ã ©tat, and in 1804, he crowned himself emperor of France in a ceremony that was

What Immigration Quotas Are Allowed Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

What Immigration Quotas Are Allowed - Assignment Example Immigration quotas are defined as barriers that restrict undesirable movement of population from one geographical region towards the other. Immigrants, wanted or otherwise, are both beneficial as well as have a negative influence on an economy. However, considering both the pros and cons of the same, countries across the globe tend to develop certain restrictions on the number of permitted immigrants existing at a given point in time in proportion to the population of the country itself (Weissbrodt, 2005). For example, a country X might form a proportion that for every 4 locals, there would be 1 immigrant, implying that if their local/domestic population is 4 million, there would be a maximum of 1 million immigrants allowed. Additionally, countries also tend to develop quotas on other countries about their maximum export of humans; for example, amongst the 1 million in the given example, the country X might decide that a maximum of 30% from Asia, and within that a maximum of 10% from India. Such obligations define the immigration quota developed by various countries to control the flow of resources and to keep other economic factors in balance such as exchange rate, the balance of payments, outflow of currency, taxes, crime rate, investments, development projects, fiscal policies, etc. This section discusses the arguments that favor the increase in immigration quotas. In the initial fold of the two-fold effect, enhancing quotas is beneficial for a society and an economy, primarily because of the fact that the quality of human resource flows in from various backgrounds and cultures, having a diversified set of skills and strengths that become beneficial for the economy in the long run. However, in the long run, immigrants tend to form lobbies which are harmful to the viability of the business.